Tagged: Vancouver Province

A fair question about Postmedia and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers

So, to recap, we have in Vancouver two major dailies owned by the same company which has (or had in 2013) a partnership with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers to “leverage all means editorially, technically and creatively to further the critical conversation” on the “importance of energy to Canada’s business competitiveness”.

In Postmedia daily #1 we have an editorial strongly in favour of corporate grants to our education system by a petroleum company.

In Postmedia daily #2 we see an op-ed by an individual who has in the past received an honorarium from the CAPP and who is vocal in support of developing Canada’s petroleum industry, equating it with patriotism.

Undoubtedly Postmedia journalists retain full editorial independence and any hint that this could be a real or perceived conflict of interest arising from the aforementioned partnership with the CAPP is ridiculous and if you do have questions you’re probably a troll or a bully.

Move along.

UPDATE: Paul Chapman of The Province and Jeff Lee of The Sun thoughtfully weighed in on the subject of the CAPP partnership on Twitter and insist, and I believe them, they have never felt any pressure to change, modify or ignore a story, etc.

But this isn’t so much about the newsroom than the editorial room and business operations. It’s about who gets to appear in the op-ed pages and when. And the safeguards in place. For example, on Dec. 4, 2013 an advertorial ran without attribution on the Vancouver Sun entitled “Born to the Challenge: Janet Holder’s B.C. roots make her the perfect lead on Northern Gateway.” It was only when a rebuttal was submitted that we, the public, found out that it was advertising. Another advertorial ran without attribution in the Postmedia owned Regina Leader-Post in error.

Similarly, management at the Globe and Mail during contract negotiations proposed newsroom staff write advertorials. (This was successfully fended off by the union).

How is the public to perceive all this? That’s really the question. It is really so outrageous to wonder that a media company in financial difficulty, that has slashed newsroom budgets and staff, might balk at crossing a group that has a strategic partnership?

As the another outlet’s code of Standards and Practices note: “The trust of the public is our most valued asset. We avoid putting ourselves in real or potential conflict of interest. This is essential to our credibility.”*

*Something noted by Kirk LaPointe, in another career.

UPDATE 2: Tom Hawthorn reminds us of the time Dan Murphy’s cartoon was pulled at the Province after pressure from Enbridge.

“‘If it doesn’t come down, Enbridge says they’re pulling a million dollars worth of advertising from Postmedia, and if it doesn’t come down, I, Wayne Moriarty, I’m going to lose my job,’” Murphy said Moriarity told him.


As mentioned, isn’t that the real danger?

FINAL UPDATE: While the issue of the advertorial remains, it should be noted for the record that The Province gave space yesterday to Emma Gilchrist of DeSmogBog to write a rebuttal of Vivian Krause’s op-ed AND the Sun issued the following correction to it’s editorial:



Godwin’s Flaw

In public discourse, comparisons of X to the actions of the Nazis or Hitler are frequently invoked too easily and too recklessly. They are often used as a crutch for, or a substitute to, a real argument…to the point where there now exists an informal rhetorical rule that any reference to Hitler automatically results in one losing the argument – Godwin’s Law.

It’s a shame, because the rise of the Nazis in Germany, the initiation of World War Two, and of course the Holocaust offer many useful warnings for us today. It’s unfortunate that the plethora of irresponsible comparisons have made it difficult to make responsible comparisons and study and apply the lessons of the past.

The Vancouver Province’s Jon Ferry attempted to take to task what he thought, I suppose, was the former:

Comparing teachers’ treatment by the B.C. legislature to that of the Jews by Hitler and the Nazis, for example, works against the very thing they say they’re fighting for.

This was done by Wendy Turner, president of the Cranbrook District Teachers Association who, Ferry says, apparently wrote a letter to The Province that did so. I say apparently because for the life of me I can’t find Turner’s letter in the online version of the letters to the editor section of The Province. Or, indeed, anywhere. Based on the use of quote marks around it, the following bolded text is what Turner actually wrote (that Ferry selectively shares with his readers):

Yes, Wendy Turner, president of the Cranbrook District Teachers Association, wrote to our newspaper to say that, as a child, she’d read Anne Frank’s Diary of a Young Girl and had asked her parents: “How could they do this to people?”

Her parents told her it was because the German people didn’t realize what was happening until it was too late. “Why was it too late?” she apparently asked. “Because by then it was the law!”

Turner said she’d forgotten those words until she realized “history was repeating itself” with the Liberals using legislation “to legitimize their stripping away of employment rights for a targeted group of people — teachers.”

Now look at the bolded text again. Is what we are allowed to see really a comparison of the plight of B.C. teachers with that of the Jews at the hands of Hitler? Or is it actually speaking to the dangers of apathy when rights are “legally” stripped away? Because the Holocaust was not the only terrible thing the Nazis did and it’s not the only example of danger they present to us. For they were a democratically elected government who did in fact begin to slowly strip the rights of German citizens away including the rights of labour to organize independently.

We don’t know if this is the comparison Turner is making. She may well have explicitly written that the B.C. Liberal government’s behaviour is akin to the Holocaust. Conversely, she may have explicitly written she was not making a comparison to the Holocaust. But based on the text surrounded by quote marks, it’s an extremely plausible interpretation she was making a comparison to the slow rollback of democratic rights by a ruling political party and the apathy of the populace.

Maybe her letter is in the print version of The Province. I will attempt to find some old issues and have a look and if I find anything I will update this post.

All in all it’s a touchy subject that requires a deft hand and perhaps Jon Ferry – being of that generation – is simply extremely sensitive to it’s mention.

So I’m sure, when his Province colleague Dan Murphy compared B.C. teachers to Hitler in an editorial cartoon, he was deeply offended and took Murphy to task.

Or maybe not.

Which would make Ferry’s outrage here selective, exploitative and very, very hypocritical.